Call : 786-539-4935
Click Here to Email Us:

Wrongful Detainer, When a Person Who is Not an Owner or a Tenant Will Not Leave Your Home

March 30, 2018 by  
Filed under Uncategorized

.

.

It came as a complete surprise to me how frequently people try to stay in other peoples homes without a legal right to be there, and how the police may not to be very helpful in resolving the situation and may even assist the person without ownership or tenancy in the home to gain access to it or remain there.  It seems horrific that someone who forced their way into your home or whom you invited in may refuse to leave, and that the police might not assist you in having them removed and may even tell them they have some right to be there. For instance, a friend who stays at  your residence, overstays their welcome, and then refuses to leave.

If you are faced with such a situation you need to consult with an attorney to evaluate your options, determine if you are able to complete an affidavit based upon which an illegal occupant can be removed by the police, or if you do not qualify for the affidavit and need to file a wrongful detainer action to get the illegal occupant out.

A wrongful detainer action is for when you are trying to remove someone from your home; when you are the owner or legal tenant; the person you are trying to remove is not a tenant or legal owner; and there is no agreement for rent.  Wrongful detainer is a distinct and separate cause of action from eviction and ejectment.  It is important to file the correct cause of action to prevent unnecessary delay in getting the person illegally occupying your home out.  If you have a person illegally occupying your home who is neither an owner or a tenant without an agreement for rent you scan contact us for a consultation about getting your home back.

 

Interpretation of a Marital Settlement Agreement

February 28, 2018 by  
Filed under Uncategorized

.

.

It is a well known fact that most cases resolve without the need to go to trial.  Often times cases resolve at mediation.  But that does not necessarily mean that there will not be litigation as to the interpretation or enforcement of a settlement agreement or mediation agreement later on.

For instance, in Rose v. Rose the parties entered into a mediated agreement where the wife could have exclusive use and possession of the former marital home until the parties daughter finished her four year college degree.  The agreement also stated that on sale of the home the proceeds would be slit evenly between the parties.  That sounds simple enough doesn’t it?

Well not quite.  The former wife took the position after the parties daughter had finished her four year college degree that the agreement did not specifically say that the home then had to be sold at that time or any other time.  It took a trial court’s and then an appellate court’s rulings to determine that the timing of the sale though not specifically stated was sufficiently stated to be enforceable as the home should be sold once the parties daughter had finished her four year college degree.

Even after the appellate Court made this ruling the case was sent back to the trial court to determine if the former husband had repudiated the mediated agreement by failing to make payments due under it.

So if you are entering into a settlement agreement keep in mind issues as to the agreement’s meaning and interpretation may come up later so you need to spell out as accurately and in as much detail as you can what is being agreed to.  It is best not to cut corners, spend the time, and have your attorney review it.

 

What is Shared Parental Responsibility?

November 17, 2017 by  
Filed under Uncategorized

.
.
.
.
“Shared parental responsibility” is where both parents retain full rights and responsibilities with respect to their child and in which both parents confer with each other so that major decisions affecting the welfare of the child will be determined together.  If the parties can not agree they can ask the court to decide the issue or change parental responsibility.
“Sole parental responsibility” means a court-ordered relationship in which one parent makes decisions regarding the minor child.
Where warranted by specific facts a court can order ultimate decision making authority or sole parental responsibility be given to one party. To award sole parental responsibility the court must make a determination that shared parental responsibility would cause detriment or harm to the child.  Sole parental responsibility is not usual and is only given where warranted by the specific facts of the case.

If you have questions about shared or sole parental responsibility in your case please call our office for a consultation.

Alimony Terminated Retroactively

August 10, 2017 by  
Filed under Uncategorized

.

.

Sometimes a change in circumstances warrants the reduction or termination of alimony.  In the case of Holli Poe Dennis v. Michael Dennis, the First District Court of Appeals for the State of Florida reversed a trial court decision that did not make the termination of alimony retroactive to the date that the Former Wife started receiving a portion of the Former Husband’s military retirement benefits.  The Court reasoned that alimony can be modified retroactively to the date of the filing of a petition for modification, and that where alimony is to be modified there is in fact a presumption that the modification should go to the date of the filing of the supplemental petition.   On the facts before it, the Court held that modification was warranted  retroactive to the date that the Wife started receiving the retirement payments.

If you need to talk to an attorney to discuss if alimony could be modified in your case based upon a substantial change in circumstances contact us for a consultation so we can evaluate your specific situation.

What Is Mandatory Disclosure?

July 6, 2017 by  
Filed under Uncategorized

.

.

Mandatory disclosure is a Florida family law term referring to the production of a financial affidavit and  financial documents required pursuant to Florida Family Law Rule 12.285 .  The rule applies to most initial and supplemental family law actions like divorce, paternity, and modification actions.  Mandatory disclosure is not required in adoption actions, simplified dissolution cases, contempt cases, domestic violence cases, and cases where a divorce is by publication.  The parties or court may modify these requirements, except a financial affidavit must always be filed in cases as to which the rule applies, and a child support worksheet must always be filed in cases involving children and child support.

A party must gather and provide to the other party each of the types of documents required by the mandatory disclosure rule and provide a certificate of compliance with mandatory disclosure. Required documents include things like pay stubs, tax returns, deeds, bank statements, account statements, and promissory notes.  In an initial or supplemental proceeding the rule requires that mandatory disclosure be completed within 45 days of service of the initial pleading unless there is an objection to the disclosure, agreement or motion for extension of time to do so.

The requirements of mandatory disclosure vary where temporary financial relief is being sought within 45 days of the filing of a petition.

The parties have a duty to update their financial affidavit and documents  whenever there is a material change in their financial circumstances.

If you have questions about your family case or the requirements of mandatory disclosure contact us and we can schedule a consult to help you.

Next Page »

Disclaimer: The Law Offices of Robert Hanreck, P.A. is based in Miami , Florida and serves clients throughout the State including Miami-Dade and Broward counties. We are licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. This website is intended for informational purposes only and is not meant to constitute legal advice, or solicit clients outside of the State of Florida.